Abstract

Professor Lee argues that traditional quality criteria for judging law libraries are now inadequate because they no longer capture the vital multiple missions of today's libraries. She suggests ways that law librarians can begin to develop indicia of quality that can adequately evaluate the contemporary law school library and preserve its core missions.

Notes

Originally published in Law Library Journal, v.100, p.9, 2008.

Keywords

academic libraries, European libraries, law schools, print, electronic sources, books, volume count, title count, accreditation, American Bar Association, ABA, standards, law librarians, licenses, core missions, collections, outcomes-based assessment models, inputs, outputs, services, Hinderman, patrons, teaching, interlibrary loan, ILL, access, preservation, collaboration, Legal Information Preservation Alliance, LIPA, collection development, open access, questionnaires, information literacy, Law School Survey of Student Engagement, LSSSE

Subject Categories

Law libraries, Evaluation

Disciplines

Library and Information Science

Publisher

American Association of Law Libraries

Publication Date

Winter 2008

Rights Information

Author retains copyright.

Rights Holder

Sarah Hooke Lee

Permanent URL

http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20001151



Click button above to open, or right-click to save.

Share

COinS