Abstract
This article documents the federal government's relinquishment, in the name of experimentation, of any obligation to set welfare policy, and the abuse of section 1115 waivers in terms of both methodology and substantive result. In Part I, I explore the historical purpose of section 1115, which was to provide for limited research projects. Parts II and III critique the abuse of section 1115 through broad-based executive waiver approvals, and show how these waiver approvals have resulted in wholesale alterations of the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program by the states. Finally, Part IV focuses on the reasons why unrestricted state discretion is not an appropriate strategy for addressing welfare policy concerns.
Disciplines
Law
Publisher
Yale Law School
Publication Date
1994
Rights Information
Copyright 1994 by Yale Law & Policy Review
Rights Holder
Yale Law & Policy Review
Permanent URL
http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002506
Recommended Citation
Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 8-37, 1994.
Notes
Originally published in Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 8-37, 1994.