Alternate Title

The fine print : law prof adds his voice to ongoing conversation on race

Abstract

This essay reviews Richard Thompson Ford's 'The Race Card: How Bluffing About Bias Makes Race Relations Worse,' Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, 2008, 388 pages. Stanford Law School Professor Richard Thompson Ford's 'The Race Card' seeks nothing less than to demarcate the line between legitimate charges of racism and those that are ill-defined or false. An impossibly ambitious task , to be sure, but Ford's wide-ranging, often maddening effort makes timely and important contributions to continuing debates on race in the United States.

Of course, no serious accusation - whether if be racism, intolerance, murder, rape, child abuse, sexual harassment, theft or corruption - should be made without corroboration, context, and serious investigation.

Unlike Ford, I believe that we spend too much time worrying that false claims will undermine good race relations. Dismissing the broader realities of racism because of a few bad claims would signal that 'good' race relations are not built on a solid foundation. If racial minorities and non-minorities from diverse perspectives are engaging in respectful and robust dialogue on a regular basis, then false charges would not so easily undermine just claims.

It is silence, indifference, and unexamined fear that will lead to the worst possible outcome - not which card is dealt.

Notes

Originally published in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly (June 2, 2008), pp.12.

Keywords

Richard Thompson Ford

Subject Categories

Race discrimination, Race relations, Racism, African Americans

Disciplines

Race and Ethnicity

Publisher

Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

Publication Date

2008

Rights Information

Author retains copyright.

Rights Holder

Hope Lewis

Permanent URL

http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20001063


View Full Text

Click button above to open, or right-click to save.

Share

COinS