Advisor(s)

Amilcar A. Barreto

Contributor(s)

Daniel R. Faber, David M. Monje

Date of Award

2011

Date Accepted

4-2011

Degree Grantor

Northeastern University

Degree Level

Ph.D.

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy

Department or Academic Unit

College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Law, Policy & Society Program

Keywords

law, policy, society, public policy and social welfare, Taliban, Afghan, Afghanistan, Muslim

Disciplines

Law and Society

Abstract

Policy analysts frequently portray the Taliban resistance as an exclusively Islamic movement. Culturally deterministic notions regarding Islamic societies have negatively influenced western governments' policies towards Muslim states. The research here advances the hypothesis that the current conflict in Afghanistan is not about "Islam." At its core the Taliban resistance is a nationalist challenge to foreign forces and their Afghan allies. Furthermore, the roots of this movement are foreign occupation, continued years of war and violence, and a lack of genuine effort on the part of the incumbent regime to implement necessary socio-economic and political reforms. This work claims that the success of the Taliban movement is firmly rooted in their appropriation of religious symbols, discourse and terminology -- particularly Shariat, or Islamic law -- to channel the frustrations of a grieving population.

Notes

This digital object replaces another digital object in IRis at http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20001033.

Document Type

Dissertation

Rights Information

copyright 2011

Rights Holder

Mariam Atifa Raqib



Click button above to open, or right-click to save.

Share

COinS