Abstract
Judgement of exercise performance in birds has been hampered by a paucity of data on maximal aerobic capacity. We measured the maximal rate of oxygen consumption (V̇o₂,max) in running guinea fowl Numida meleagris, a bird that has been used in several previous studies of avian running. Mean V̇o₂,max during level treadmill running was 97.5±3.7 mL O&8322; kg⁻¹ min⁻¹ (mean ± SEM, N=5). V̇o₂,max was on average 6% higher when the birds ran uphill compared with the value during level running (paired t-test, P=0.041, N=5). The mean basal rate of oxygen consumption (V̇o₂,bmr) of the same individuals was 7.9±0.5 mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹.Mean factorial aerobic scope based on individually measured values of V̇o₂,max and V̇o₂,bmr was 13.2 ± 0.6 (mean ± SEM, N=5). This value was considerably lower than the factorial aerobic scope previously measured during running in Rhea americana, a large flightless ratite. The difference in factorial scope between these two running birds likely reflects the effects of body size as well as size-independent differences in the ability to deliver and use oxygen. These data confirm a previous prediction that birds have a diversity of factorial aerobic scopes similar to that exhibited by mammals.
Keywords
birds, guinea fowl, Numida meleagris, oxygen consumption, running
Subject Categories
Guineafowl--Physiology, Mammals--Physiology
Disciplines
Poultry or Avian Science | Zoology
Publisher
University of Chicago
Publication Date
9-2003
Rights Information
© 2003
Rights Holder
University of Chicago
Permanent URL
Recommended Citation
Ellerby, David J.; Cleary, MaryEllen; Marsh, Richard L.; and Buchanan, Cindy I., "Measurement of maximum oxygen consumption in guinea fowl Numida meleagris indicates that birds and mammals display a similar diversity of aerobic scopes during running" (2003). Biology Faculty Publications. Paper 4. http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20000612
Click button above to open, or right-click to save.




Notes
Originally published in Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 76(5):695–703, 2003. DOI: 10.1086/376430